<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OODAlink &#187; PS-Prep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oodalink.com/tag/ps-prep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oodalink.com</link>
	<description>Timely Connections for Uncertain Times</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:08:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comments Due on Private Sector Preparedness Standards</title>
		<link>http://oodalink.com/comments-due-on-private-sector-preparedness-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://oodalink.com/comments-due-on-private-sector-preparedness-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Harvey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergency Preparedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Continuity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community preparedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS private sector preparedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Response Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national preparedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Sector Preparedness Accreditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PS-Prep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary private sector preparedness accreditation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oodalink.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security is soliciting input - by January 15 - on their proposed standards for the new Voluntary Private Sector Preparedness Accreditation and Certification Program (PS-Prep). Consider the communications availability standards in the ASIS document. Are they detailed enough? Should satellite technologies become standard? Should voice and data be stipulated?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Homeland Security is soliciting comments &#8211; <strong>by January 15</strong> &#8211; on their proposed <a href="http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/1009_comment.htm">standards</a> for the new <a onclick="window.open('http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/index.htm','PS-Prep','location=yes,menubar=yes,resizable=yes,toolbar=yes,width=l,height=c');return false;" href="http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/index.htm">Voluntary Private Sector Preparedness Accreditation and Certification Program (PS-Prep)</a>. Recommended by the 9/11 commission, PS-Prep was developed for private entities to receive certification for emergency preparedness from DHS.</p>
<p>&#8220;Preparedness is a shared responsibility and everyone—including businesses, universities and non-profit organizations—has a role to play,&#8221; said Napolitano when announcing the proposed standards in October. &#8220;Ensuring our private sector partners have the information and training they need to respond to disasters will strengthen our efforts to build a culture of preparedness nationwide.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-1092"></span>DHS proposed <a onclick="window.open('http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/1009_comment.htm','','location=yes,scrollbars=yes,menubar=yes,resizable=yes,toolbar=yes');return false;" href="http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/1009_comment.htm">PS-Prep standards</a> from three organizations: the National Fire Protection Association, the British Standards Institution and ASIS International. So why not peruse these <a href="http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/1009_comment.htm">documents</a> and submit comments and/or recommend additional standards for DHS to consider?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s just one snippet to ponder. In Section 4.3.3 of the <a href="http://www.asisonline.org/guidelines/ASIS_SPC.1-2009_Item_No._1842.pdf">ASIS document</a> (&#8220;Organizational Resilience: Security Preparedness, and Continuity Management Systems &#8211; Requirements and Guidance for Use&#8221;), you&#8217;ll find a discussion on communication standards that includes:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;With regard to its hazards, threats and risks, and OR management system, the organization shall establish, implement, and maintain (a) procedure (s) for &#8230; g) <strong>Assuring availability of the means of communication during a crisis situation and disruption</strong>.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What do you think of this? Is there enough meat to it? Should it stipulate that  satellite technologies be an element of a private entity&#8217;s emergency preparedness strategies?  When man-made and natural disruptions occur, terrestrial communications infrastructure is indisputably vulnerable. Satellites, floating 30,000 feet above the chaos, can provide peace of mind &#8211; with their reliable voice and data connectivity. Governments and militaries around the world have relied on satellite services for years. Why not the private sector? And why not make it a standard?</p>
<p>And should the standards go a step further and define what &#8220;communication&#8221; actually means in the 21st century? Should it require that voice <em>and </em>data capabilities be assured, given our ubiquitous reliance on email, texting, and various Web 2.0 applications?</p>
<p>As we embark on a new year, let&#8217;s stretch ourselves a bit. Let&#8217;s think beyond the same-old, same-old. And let&#8217;s make sure there are no gray areas when it comes to communications availability. After all, if we can&#8217;t connect with others in a time of crisis, how can we  possibly recover?</p>
<p>Please submit your comments to DHS by January 15.</p>
<p><strong>Wishing you peace and preparedness in 2010!</strong></p>
<h2>More Information on PS-Prep</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.fema.gov/privatesector/preparedness/1009_comment.htm">DHS PS-Prep Fact Sheet</a></p>
<p>DHS posted the Federal Register notice at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/">www.regulations.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Submit comments to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/">www.regulations.gov</a> or <a href="mailto:FEMA-POLICY@dhs.gov">FEMA-POLICY@dhs.gov</a>. (Identify Docket ID FEMA-2008-0017).</p>
<p>For more  information, e-mail <a href="mailto:PrivateSectorPreparedness@hsi.dhs.gov">PrivateSectorPreparedness@hsi.dhs.gov</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oodalink.com/comments-due-on-private-sector-preparedness-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

